We were in the market for a new fridge a few months ago, and Whirlpool was one of the brands we wrote off as being shoddy, older technology. Nice to see they're starting to play catchup. (We ended up getting an LG fridge to go with the washing machine, vacuum cleaner and cd drive).
What makes you think LG has better technology? Are you assuming that because they make cell phones and flat screen TVs or did you really see something in their appliances that told you "better technology"?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
nih @ Oct 1st 2007 3:46AM
We were in the market for a new fridge a few months ago, and Whirlpool was one of the brands we wrote off as being shoddy, older technology. Nice to see they're starting to play catchup. (We ended up getting an LG fridge to go with the washing machine, vacuum cleaner and cd drive).
CPTKevin @ Oct 27th 2007 3:05PM
What makes you think LG has better technology? Are you assuming that because they make cell phones and flat screen TVs or did you really see something in their appliances that told you "better technology"?
nih @ Oct 27th 2007 5:17PM
LG is fucking quality. Whirlwind is absolute garbage. Even the demo whirlwind units were showing wear and damage.
I don't spend two grand lightly, so don't bother shilling for whirlwind. They can keep their ten-year-old styling and poor workmanship.
So, tell me again why you think trusting a brand is bad enough to try and compare fridge shopping to cell phones? Are you astro-turfing?
nih @ Oct 27th 2007 5:18PM
Wait, you ARE, aren't you. Responding to comments nearly a month old? Is whirlwind worried they're looking bad on google?
nih @ Oct 27th 2007 5:19PM
Wait, you ARE, aren't you. Responding to comments nearly a month old? Is whirlwind worried they're looking bad on google?