[Erik @ Sep 16th 2007 5:07PM]

ughhh.

[Nikola @ Sep 16th 2007 9:05PM]

ugg is right.

The obnoxious, arrogant tone of this article REEKS unprofessionalism.

We come here for news and links about tech and gadgets, some still be born in the lab. We don't come here for derisive "I shouldn't have to tell you" rants about one guy's OPINION. Guess what, I shouldn't have to tell you that at one time you'd be thrown in jail or a mental hospital for suggesting the world was round. And guess what, there will come a time where people understand the mechanics that make "free energy" devices a possibility, and a practicality.

These advances -WHICH ARE INEVITABLE- will not come from people like the dickhead that wrote this article, or the minions who pride themselves on blind faith to dying laws. It will come from the person who asks..."what if".

[nih @ Sep 16th 2007 9:12PM]

So you're saying Engadget need to stop expressing opinions on their blog? Whose should they express? Yours?

Just a hunch, but you probably don't matter to Engadget.

[Nikola @ Sep 16th 2007 9:42PM]

Maybe as one "clicker" I don't. But as someone said the tone of this article and others like it are "repulsive".

Keep up the polarizing articles and engadget won't to worry about posters expressing disapproval because they will probably stop coming altogether. If engadget doesn't care about the hit it could take by going from "neutral" to biased/polarizing, then by all means continue.

[Joshua Susmarski @ Sep 16th 2007 10:40PM]

Nikola:
Your absolutely right. So what if the laws of thermal dynamics say its impossible to even get the same amount of energy out as you put in. So what if their website says nothing of any of the magical physical properties that would be required to do this. So what if there's no proof it works. If we blindly believe utter bullshit, it has to be true! Laws of science and reason be damned!

[coffeepot64 @ Sep 16th 2007 11:53PM]

ughhh

(It says to say that in the article...)

[Sam Murr @ Sep 17th 2007 8:05AM]

They say they broke the laws of thermodynamics with a plastic tube.

Rather than share this technology with the world, or even (gasp), use this technology to create an energy company that would literally be able to rape the world blind under it's current setup, they've instead decided to just market their technology in the form of a plastic tube that sends hot water around your house for cheap.

This definitely doesn't deserve any sort of mockery or condescension, you're right. I think I speak for everyone when I say that Engadget really screwed the pooch here by poopooing a miracle of science just b/c they think they're superior. Oh wait, that's not what happened. You Nikola, are a tard. I hope your name isn't a reference to Tesla, b/c if it is, you're insulting him.